Archive for: December, 2008

Not-so-happy Zune year

Dec 31 2008 Published by Kyle Buis under Pen & Links

This post originally appeared at the Pen & Links blog

Owners of Microsoft’s Zune media player found a lovely surprise waiting for them for the new year: A brick.

Well, a bricked Zune at least.

It’s not quite Y2K and it only affects the 30gb versions, but still, it’s not good PR. By the way, if you’re feeling ambitious, here’s the fix.

No responses yet

Got a new computer? Don’t forget to trash it

Dec 30 2008 Published by Kyle Buis under Pen & Links

It’s almost the new year and Christmas/Hanukkah/Kwanzaa have passed. The gifts are all open, new toys have been broken in and a few lucky people got a new computer for Christmas. If you’re one of those people, congratulations.

Now wipe the thing clean and reinstall the operating system.

If you get a computer somewhat on the cheap from some amazing deal Best Buy or Circuit City or Wal-Mart had, chances are you’re also the proud owner of bloatware.

What’s bloatware? Glad you asked. It’s that free trial software that comes with a computer and causes me more tech support headaches than anything in January. People get this amazing software they think is free, get really attached to it and after 30 days have passed, WHAM, it doesn’t work anymore.

The reason why those computers are so cheap is because software companies pay a fee to put their software on the machine so people have a chance to try it out. It’s like how newspapers and magazines put ads in their papers to cut back on the cost to their readers. As a result, the computer is significantly cheaper. This is even more true around the holidays. The lower the prices, the more bloatware. The exception is the smaller ultra-portable laptops.

If you pop in your Windows install CD, there should be an option to start it up and reinstall your operating system. That way you start with a clean slate and you can enjoy that new computer a little bit more.

No responses yet

A-head in the cloud?

Dec 28 2008 Published by Kyle Buis under Pen & Links

This post originally appeared at the Pen & Links blog

On today’s A5 there was a story about a company making it’s way into the cloud for their computer needs.

Before we begin, I want to make sure to clarify that Lando Calrissian is not involved in this. The cloud doesn’t involve Cloud City, rather it’s a metaphor for a different way for how data and applications are stored.

Right now, if you want to use Microsoft Word, you need to buy Microsoft Office, install it on your computer, save everything you create on your computer, as well as remembering to check for more updates to install. For most users this can be a hassle.

Now take that one computer and multiply it by a few hundred employees and you can see what kind of a hassle it can be. The cost in money, time and manpower can be a headache, even if something doesn’t go wrong.

Enter the cloud.

The system the story discussed involved Google’s many applications, including Google Docs and gmail. The big benefits are the ability to collaborate on documents easier, and not having a mass of programs to maintain on your computers. Amazon is taking this a step further by offering people remote storage on their S3 servers. Think of it like a backup hard drive stored somewhere else that you can access anywhere.

Sounds wonderful, doesn’t it? There’s just one small flaw:

They all rely on the Internet, which is bad for three reasons

1. Is it working? - Ideally when you’re trying to get work done, it’s best to rely on as few people as possible. In this case, rather than relying on people who are in house or in your company’s phone directory, you’re relying on a whole lot more to get to your data. First there’s your Internet Service Provider (or ISP) who will hopefully have a working connection. Then there’s the company who’s hosing your information. As long as everything is OK on their end everything is fine. But if one thing slips up on deadline, well, who ya gonna call?

2. Feeling swift today? – As is the case with most companies, the speed of an Internet connection probably isn’t lightning quick. It’s enough to take care of Googling something or checking your e-mail, but if a couple of people are downloading something at the same time, the Internet…grinds…to…a………halt.

Let’s add onto that a little bit. How often does your office use Microsoft Word? How much more traffic would that add to put your documents on the Web or to download them? If a network can handle that, then Google Docs would be a good alternative.

But what about backups? One of the little secrets ISPs have is a capped upstream. When Comcast tells you that they offer speeds up to 6 megabits (not megabytes mind you. I’ll hit on that in a future post), they’re often referring to download speeds, or the speed something can be sent to your computer. When it comes to uploading, speeds are often drastically lower than downloading.

Let’s take a quick speed sample. I decided to find something near a gigabyte (or 1,000 megabytes) in size. I found this server software download from Apple and the download on my connection at the Appeal-Democrat will take roughly an hour. Now let’s take that and think in terms of an upload speed that’s half as fast as that download speed. Most upload speeds are even slower, but I’m a fan of easy math. Twice as long would take two hours to upload

Now take a look at your hard drive. Personally I have a 60 gigabyte music collection that I might want to back up online. If it takes a gigabyte an hour, that’s roughly 120 hours in a perfect scenario, or roughly five days. I typically don’t go a week without using my computer and most businesses don’t go dark for five days very often.

3. Do you have the bandwidth? - ISPs like Comcast are starting to tinker with the idea of bandwidth caps (another topic i’ll hit on in a future post). Basically it’s saying you can only upload and download so much data each month or they’ll cut you off. Right now Comcast is working with a 250 gigabyte cap, which is fairly reasonable for the average user. But now let’s factor in the idea of making a nightly backup where each night you send up a new backup of your hard drive to store somewhere in the cloud. A few gigabytes here, a few gigabytes there and suddenly you’re getting really close to that 250 gigabyte limit.

Now all of this isn’t to say that you shouldn’t use the cloud. People use it all the time with their e-mail whether it’s through Yahoo, Hotmail or Gmail. The key is to not always rely on it. If you’re going to use it for e-mail, make sure you either download or print the important ones. If you’re going to use something like Google Docs, make sure to have a copy handy on your desktop of your important documents. Google Docs also offers an offline mode which means you don’t always have to be connected to the Internet.

The cloud can be very handy. In fact, I’m even going to make a software recommendation that’s based on the cloud called Evernote. It’s free for the average user, give it a shot. It’s usable in a Web browser, on your desktop and even on your phone. It’s both Windows and Mac compatible and I wish I could use it in the office more. Alas, my computer’s operating system is a few versions behind what’s needed.

No responses yet

Macworld coverage coming soon

Dec 28 2008 Published by Kyle Buis under Pen & Links

This post originally appeared at the Pen & Links blog

Can’t make it to San Francisco for Macworld next month? Don’t worry, Pen & Links will have you covered on the first two days of the expo with news and product information from the Moscone Center. Stay tuned for more information.

No responses yet

Why won’t my TV work?

Dec 26 2008 Published by Kyle Buis under Pen & Links

This post originally appeared at the Pen & Links blog

As most people are aware by now, the digital TV transition is at hand. Some of you may be spending this day after Christmas hooking up your new TVs you bought specifically for this transition. Congratulations on being richer than I am.

Sure, you could rationalize buying your giant new flat screen TV because in two months your TV won’t work, but you can be ready for much cheaper than a $1,000 set.

First off let’s clear up some confusion

1. This is not the HD transition – There is no such thing as a high definition TV transition. You don’t even need an HD TV to get the signal. The only thing that’s changing is the way TV stations are sending the signal. If you’re getting your TV through your cable or satellite provider, you should be just fine.

2. You do not need to go to digital cable – Comcast is not sucking up basic cable channels to the digital tier for this transition. That’s a whole other can of worms I’m sure they couldn’t explain with a straight face (although the good news is you won’t be losing anymore channels to digital cable for a little while). Between misinformed employees and using the common word “digital,” these two events have been confused. If you have cable, you do not need to upgrade to digital cable unless Comcast snatched away a channel you like and you don’t want to go satellite.

3. Not everything is happening on Feb, 17 – Some stations have already swapped their signals, which is sort of a blessing in disguise. An easy way to find out if you’re ready for the transition is if you get KCVU from Chico. As of Dec. 22, it ended its analog transmissions. So if you get KCVU right now, that’s a sure sign you’re ready.

I mentioned something earlier about doing the switch cheaper than buying a new TV. You can buy a converter box at most retail stores. It’ll take the digital signal and make it compatible with an analog TV. Some boxes can push $80 easily, but it shouldn’t be hard to find one around $40 and you can get a coupon from the government to help defray the cost.

If you bought your TV within the last year and a half, you should definitely be fine.

And, hey, if you screw up and don’t have anything to watch on your TV come Feb. 17, why not try our video section?

No responses yet

Older posts »